Oh, that’s been done in various cartoons and in the fora here. The argument is that there are laws that “force” lenders to take on some more risky borrowers. Unfortunately for that logic, that only applies to 25% of the lending organizations that provided subprimes. Probably a more central reason is that the big companies thought they could make money and minimize the risk even with riskier subprime mortgages through new derivatives, which turned out to be stunningly wrong - instead of spreading the risk, we’ve multiplied it across a larger scope and taken down the whole economy at once. So they went after the money regardless of risk.
Oh, that’s been done in various cartoons and in the fora here. Th...more

It seems that,”this is why” regarding the $$$ now.Ought not one examine the other side, the purchaser(s)?